本課程探討田野研究的理論、方法與技巧。學生透過實踐，學習基本的田野研究技巧，了解其作用與局限。學生需參與田野研究，在課堂上分享經驗及討論所面對的問題。最後，學生必須提交其學期研究報告。

（課程簡介及考察安排）

一、學期論文（佔50%）：

學員可選取任何一種工藝或工藝師為對象，又或選擇某一社區（如鄉村、墟市、街坊等），群體組織或機構（如同鄉會、街坊會、工會、花炮會、廟宇、教會、工廠、商號等）為對象，利用在課堂上學習之方法，草擬研究計劃後，與導師商討，研究此工藝師的生命史、工藝的承傳，或行業組織的歷史發展，又或社區、群體組織或機構等的歷史發展，撰寫不多於5000字的學期論文，於7月2日前提交學期論文。

每位同學都必須於6月1日前提交草擬之研究計劃，與導師商討； 依據導師之意見，進行修改，並於6月15日提交正式之研究計劃及文獻資料介紹。

二、田野工作坊報告： （20%）

田野工作坊將會以小組形式進行，每一學員都要撰寫田野筆記，字數不限；於第六周課堂上，每組都需要做小組口頭報告。工作坊內容，將會在課堂上介紹。

三、導修：（佔20%）

分兩次，讀王明珂，《華夏邊緣：歷史記憶與族群認同》，杭州：浙江人民出版社，2013年（增訂本）。

第一次：讀序言與第一、二部份（6月1日）

第二次：讀第三、四部份及結語（6月15日）

四、課堂出席與表現（佔10%）

評分標準

1. 學期論文                                                                50%

2. 田野工作坊報告                                                     20%

3. 導修                                                                        20%

4. 課堂出席與表現                                                    10%

————————————————————————-

總分                                                                         100%

（一）探討田野與田野工作的內容：

1. Akhil Gupta and James Ferguson eds., Anthropological Locations: boundaries and Grounds of a Field Science, Berkeley: University of California Press, 1997.
2. Robert M. Emerson, Rachel I. Fretz, Linda L. Shaw, Writing Ethnographic Fieldnotes, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2011.

（二）文獻資料的搜集與解讀：

1. 劉志偉，〈宗族與沙田開發──番禺沙灣何族的個案研究〉，《中國農史》，1992年第4期，頁34-41。
2. Faure,  David, “The Lineage as a Cultural Invention: The Case of the Pearl River Delta,” Modern China, Vol. 15 No.1 (Jan. 1989 ), 4-36.
3. Hiroaki Kani, A General Survey of the Boat People in Hong Kong, Hong Kong: Southeast Asia Studies Section, New Asia Research Institute, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, 1967.
4. Hiroaki Kani, The Boat People in Shatin, N.T., Hong Kong: The Settlement Patterns in 1967 &1968, in The Chung Chi Journal, Vol.11 no. 2 (Oct. 1972), pp. 57-65.
5. Barbara E. Ward, Varieties of the Conscious Model: The Fishermen of South China, in Through Other Eyes: An Anthropologist’s View of Hong Kong, Hong Kong: Chinese University of Hong Kong, 1985, pp.41-60.
6. Barbara E. Ward, Sociological Self-awareness: Some Uses of the Conscious Models, in Through Other Eyes: An Anthropologist’s View of Hong Kong, Hong Kong: Chinese University of Hong Kong, 1985, pp.61-78.

上述兩文可參看中譯，馮承聰等編譯，《從人類學看香港社會：華德英教授論文集》，香港：大學出版印務公司，1985。

（三）口述資料的搜集與整理：

1. Ritchie, Donald A., Doing Oral History: A Practical Guide, New York: Maxwell Macmillan International, 1995. （中譯本：王芝芝、姚力譯，《大家來做口述歷史：實務指南》，北京：當代中國出版社，2003）
2. Thompson, Paul, The Voice of the Past Oral History, Oxford University Press, 1988. （中譯本：覃方明、渠東、張旅平合譯，《過去的聲音：口述歷史》，香港：牛津大學出版社，1999.
3. Tosh, John, The pursuit of history : aims, methods and new directions in the study of modern history, Harlow, England ; New York : Longman, 2010. Introduction.（中譯本：定宜庄、汪潤主編，《口述史讀本》，北京：北京大學出版社，2011，頁3-26。）
4. Goody, Jack, “Memory in Oral Tradition,” in Fara, Patricia and Patterson, Karalyn eds., Memory, Cambridge: Darwin College, 1998, pp. 73-94.

（四）田野考察：大埔大王爺誕

1. Robert G. Groves, “The Origins of Two Market Town in the New Territories,” in  Aspects of Social Organization in the New Territories, ed. by Marjorie Topley, Hong Kong: Royal Asiatic Society, Hong Kong Branch, 1964, pp.16-20.
2. 吳倫霓霞，〈香港新界墟市之興起與衰落－－大埔墟研究〉，《漢學研究》第3卷第2期（1985.12)，頁633-653。
3. 卜永堅，〈墟市研究〉，《大埔傳統與文物》編輯委員會，《大埔傳統與文物》，香港：大埔區議會漁農工商、旅遊及文娛康體委員會，推廣大埔區本土經濟發展工作小組，2008，頁50-63。

（五）社會記憶

1. Le Goff, Jacques, “Memory”, in Jacques Le Goff, Translated by Steven Rendall and Elizabeth Claman, History and Memory, New York: Columbia University Press,1992, pp. 51-99.
2. Connerton, Paul, How Societies Remember, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989.
3. Goody, Jack, “Memory in Oral Tradition,” in Fara, Patricia and Patterson, Karalyn eds., Memory, Cambridge: Darwin College, 1998, pp. 73-94.
4. （德）哈拉尔德、韋尔策編，季斌，王立君，白鍚堃譯，《社會記憶：歷史、回憶、傳承》，北京：北京大學出版社，2007，〈第三部份：社會回憶與回憶集體〉，頁179-269。
5. Faure,  David, Emperor and Ancestor: State and Lineage in South China, Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2007. 中譯本：科大衛著、卜永堅譯，《皇帝和祖宗──華南的國家與宗族》，南京：江蘇人民出版社，2009。

（六）長洲端午遊龍

1. Yoshiro Shiratori ed., The Dragon Boat Festival in Hong Kong, Tokyo: Sophia University, 1985.
2. 廖迪生，張兆和，《大澳》，〈第七章：大澳的宗教活動中的社區組織〉，香港：三聯書店（香港）有限公司，2006, 頁155-190
3. 李亦園，〈端午與屈原──傳說與儀式結構關係再探〉，收於《李亦園自選集》，上海：上海教育出版社，2002，頁313-330。
4. 李亦園，〈寒食與介之推──一則中國古代神話與儀式的結構學研究〉，收於《李亦園自選集》，上海：上海教育出版社，2002，頁297-312。
5. Ajimer, Göran, The dragon boat festival on the Hupeh-Hunan Plain, Central China: a study of the ceremonialism of the transplantation of rice. Stockholm: ethnographical Museum, 1964

（七）文化人類學的視角

1. Burke, Peter, What is Cultural History? , Cambridge: Malden, Mass.: Polity Press, 2004.
2. Zemon Davis, Natalie, The Return of Martin Guerre, Cambridge, Mass.,: Harvard University Press,1983 （中譯本：江政寬譯，《馬丹、蓋赫返鄉記》，聯經：2000）
3. Zemon Davis, Natalie, Fiction in the archives:  pardon tales and their tellers in sixteenth-century France, Cambridge: Polity Press, 1987.
4. Emmanuel, Le Roy Ladurie,  Mengtayou, Village Occitan de 1294-1324, Editions Gallimard, 1975,（中譯本：埃馬紐埃爾˙勒華拉杜裡著 ， 許明龍、馬勝利譯，蒙塔尤 : 1294-1324年奧克西坦尼的一個山村，北京 : 商務印書館, 2009.
5, Geertz, Clifford, “Deep Play: Notes on the Balinese Cockfight,” in Chandra Mukerji and Michael Schudson (eds) Rethinking Popular Culture: Contemporary Perspectives in Cultural Studies, Berkeley: University of California Press, 1991, pp.239-277.
6. Geertz, Clifford, The Interpretation of Cultures: selected essays, New York: Basic Books, 1973. （中譯本：韓莉譯，《文化的解釋》，南京：譯林出版社，1999）
7. Darnton, Robert, The Great Cat Massacre and Other Episodes in French Cultural History, New York: Basic Books, 1999. （中譯本：呂健忠譯，《屠猫記：法國文化史鈎沉》，北京：新星出版社，2006）
8. Hunt, Lynn, The New Cultural History, Berkeley: University of California Press, 1989

Attention is drawn to University policy and regulations on honesty in academic work, and to the disciplinary guidelines and procedures applicable to breaches of such policy and regulations. Details may be found at here.

With each assignment, students will be required to submit a signed declaration that they are aware of these policies, regulations, guidelines and procedures.

• In the case of group projects, all members of the group should be asked to sign the declaration, each of whom is responsible and liable to disciplinary actions, irrespective of whether he/she has signed the declaration and whether he/she has contributed, directly or indirectly, to the problematic
• For assignments in the form of a computer-generated document that is principally text-based and submitted via VeriGuide, the statement, in the form of a receipt, will be issued by the system upon students’ uploading of the soft copy of the assignment. 
• Students are fully aware that their work may be investigated by AI content detection software to determine originality.
• Students are fully aware of the AI approach(es) adopted in the course. In the case where some AI tools are allowed, students have made proper acknowledgment and citations as instructed by the course teacher.

Assignments without the properly signed declaration will not be graded by teachers.

Only the final version of the assignment should be submitted via VeriGuide.

The submission of a piece of work, or a part of a piece of work, for more than one purpose (e.g. to satisfy the requirements in two different courses) without declaration to this effect shall be regarded as having committed undeclared multiple submissions. It is common and acceptable to reuse a turn of phrase or a sentence or two from one’s own work; but wholesale reuse is problematic. In any case, agreement from the course teacher(s) concerned should be obtained prior to the submission of the piece of work.

The copyright of the teaching materials, including lecture notes, assignments and examination questions etc., produced by staff members/ teachers of The Chinese University of Hong Kong (CUHK) belongs to CUHK. Students may download the teaching materials produced by the staff members/ teachers from the Learning Management Systems, e.g. Blackboard adopted by CUHK for their own educational use, but shall not distribute/ share/ copy the materials to a third-party without seeking prior permission from the staff members/ teachers concerned.