本課程旨在介紹及比較法國革命（何佩然）、俄國革命（熊秉真），以及中國革命（葉漢明），每位導師將就所討論的革命講授四節，從不同角度介紹各革命的特質。培養學生透過比較、分析不同革命的異同，認識革命，並學習思考，理解革命的普遍定義。

1. 四次導修（40%）

－書面報告（20%）

－導修表現（20%）

2. 家課式考試（60%）

－兩篇短文，各佔30%，其中一篇短文必須比較兩個革命運動

導修組別登記

同學須在選課期結束前（9月19日）於eLearning登記任意一組導修組別。

本課程導修組別共分四組，每組上限為15人。達到人數上限的組別將無法加入，屆時請另擇他組。各組導修時間為：

• 導修小組A：週一（6/10, 20/10, 3/11, 17/11）14:30至16:15（SC_139）
• 導修小組B：週一（6/10, 20/10, 3/11, 17/11）16:30至18:15（MMW_715）
• 導修小組C：週四（9/10, 23/10, 6/11, 20/11）14:30至16:15（LSK_203）
• 導修小組D：週四（9/10, 23/10, 6/11, 20/11）16:30至18:15（LSK_203）

導修要求

• 每位同學均須出席四次導修課，並就其中一條導修題目撰寫書面報告及於導修課上進行口頭報告。
• 導修題目將隨機委派。委派結果將在9月19日晚於eLearning公佈。
• 口頭報告：約10-15分鐘；書面報告：約2000字。

導修注意事項

• 書面報告須於導修課前2個工作天，連同已簽署的VeriGuide收條繳交至馮景禧樓一樓歷史系助教（李俊威）之個人信箱內。
• 負責口頭報告的同學宜設計一些問題引領旁聽同學進行討論。
• 每節導修課所擬題目只為一個概括式的主題，同學在書寫報告時可因應閱讀建議材料後之心得將題目收窄。
• 首三次導修均設有指定電影欣賞，請同學輔以其他閱讀材料，以電影述評的形式撰寫書面報告。
• 書寫報告時可憑個人意向斟酌應用所提供的閱讀材料（毋須全部採納），亦歡迎同學掇拾其他閱讀材料（原始史料為佳）以充實或闡明個人觀點。
• 導修之閱讀材料將於開課後陸續上載至eLearning，敬希查照。

評分細則

(導修題目及相關參考資料請留意本科之eLearning。)

指定參考書

Michael S. Kimmel, Revolution: A Sociological Interpretation, Cambridge, 1990.

T. Skocpol, States and Social Revolutions: A Comparative Analysis of France, Russia and China, Cambridge ; New York : Cambridge University Press, 1979.

其他參考書

法國

Doyle, William, Origins of the French Revolution, Oxford University Press, 1980, Chapter 1-5［中譯本：蔡百銓譯：《法國大革命的起源》（台北市：國立編譯館，1995）］

Furet & D. Richet, La révolution française, Paris: Fayard, 1973

Lefebvre, G., R.P. Palmer trans., The Coming of the French Revolution, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1967

Palmer, R.R. The Age of the Democratic Revolution: a political history of Europe and America, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1959-64

Roger Price, The Economic Modernization of France, 1730-1880, London: Croom Helm, 1975, Chapter 2

Soboul, Albert, La Révolution française, París: Gallimard, 1964

Tocqueville, L’ancien régime et la révolution, Paris, 1856, Part 3［中譯本：馮棠譯；桂裕芳、張芝聯校：《舊制度與大革命》（香港：牛津大學出版社，1994）；英譯：Stuart Gilbert trans., The ancien regime and the Franch revolution, London: Collins, 1966］

俄國

李邁先《俄國史》上、下卷（台北：正中書局，1969年）

Ascher, Abraham, The Kremlin, New York: Newsweek, 1972

Gilbert, Martin. Atlas of Russian History, New York: Dorset Press, 1985

Gleason, Abbott, Peter Kenez & Richard Stites eds., Bolshevik Culture: Experiment and Order in the Russian Revolution, Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, 1989

Gleason, Abbott, Young Russia: The Genesis of Russian Radicalism in the 1860s, New York: The Viking Press, 1980

Mailloux, Kenneth F. & Heloise P. Mailloux, Lenin: The Exile Returns, Princeton: Auerbach, 1971

Riha, Thomas ed., Readings in Russian Civilization, Vol. II Imperial Russia, 1700–1917, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1964

Seton-Watson, Hugh, From Lenin to Khrushchev. New York: Frederick A. Praeger, 1960

Slonim, Marc, From Chekhov to the Revolution: Russian Literature 1900–1917, New York: Oxford University Press, 1962

Trotsky, Leon, F.W. Dupee ed., The Russian Revolution: The Overthrow of Tzarism and The Triumph of the Soviets, New York: Doubleday & Company, 1959

中國

陳永發：《中國共產革命七十年》，上、下 （臺北市：聯經出版事業公司，1998）

蕭超然、沙建孫：《中國革命史稿》（北京：北京大學出版社，1984）

楊雲若、楊奎松：《共產國際和中國革命》（上海：上海人民出版社，1988）

翟作君、鄔正洪：《中國革命史研究薈萃》（上海：華東師範大學出版社，1986）

房成祥，高慶達主编：《中國革命問題比較研究》（西安：陝西師範大學出版社，1993）

鄒讜：《二十世紀中國政治》（香港：牛津大學出版社，2012）

卜偉華著：《中華人民共和國史‧第6卷，砸爛舊世界》（香港：香港中文大學當代中國文化研究中心，2008）

李澤厚，劉再復：《告別革命：回望二十世紀中國》（香港：天地圖書有限公司，1997）

Chen Yung-fa, Making Revolution: the communist movement in eastern and central China, 1937-1945, Berkeley: University of California Press, 1986

Esherick, J. et al., eds., The Chinese Cultural Revolution as History, Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 2006

Lu, Xing, Rhetoric of the Chinese Cultural Revolution: the Impact on Chinese Thought, Culture, and Communication, Columbia, S.C.: University of South Carolina Press, 2004

MacFarquhar, R. and M. Schoenhals, Mao’s last revolution. Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2006［中譯本：關心譯；唐少傑審定：《毛澤東最後的革命》（臺北縣新店市：左岸文化，2009）］ 

Meisner, M., Mao’s China and After: A History of the People’s Republic, New York: Free Press; London: Collier Macmillan, c1986［中譯本：杜蒲譯：《毛澤東的中國及其後：中華人民共和國史》（香港：中文大學出版社，2005）］

Mittler B., A continuous Revolution: Making Sense of Cultural Revolution Culture, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Asia Center, 2012 

Saich, T. & Hans van de Ven, eds., New Perspectives on the Chinese Communist Revolution, Armonk, N.Y.: M.E. Sharpe, 1995

Starr, J.B.,Revolution in Retrospect: The Paris Commune Through Chinese Eyes, Berkeley: Center for Chinese Studies, 1972

Wasserstrom, J.N. ed., Twentieth-Century China: New Approaches. London ; New York: Routledge, 2003, Chs. 3 & 7

Attention is drawn to University policy and regulations on honesty in academic work, and to the disciplinary guidelines and procedures applicable to breaches of such policy and regulations. Details may be found at here.

With each assignment, students will be required to submit a signed declaration that they are aware of these policies, regulations, guidelines and procedures.

• In the case of group projects, all members of the group should be asked to sign the declaration, each of whom is responsible and liable to disciplinary actions, irrespective of whether he/she has signed the declaration and whether he/she has contributed, directly or indirectly, to the problematic
• For assignments in the form of a computer-generated document that is principally text-based and submitted via VeriGuide, the statement, in the form of a receipt, will be issued by the system upon students’ uploading of the soft copy of the assignment. 
• Students are fully aware that their work may be investigated by AI content detection software to determine originality.
• Students are fully aware of the AI approach(es) adopted in the course. In the case where some AI tools are allowed, students have made proper acknowledgment and citations as instructed by the course teacher.

Assignments without the properly signed declaration will not be graded by teachers.

Only the final version of the assignment should be submitted via VeriGuide.

The submission of a piece of work, or a part of a piece of work, for more than one purpose (e.g. to satisfy the requirements in two different courses) without declaration to this effect shall be regarded as having committed undeclared multiple submissions. It is common and acceptable to reuse a turn of phrase or a sentence or two from one’s own work; but wholesale reuse is problematic. In any case, agreement from the course teacher(s) concerned should be obtained prior to the submission of the piece of work.

The copyright of the teaching materials, including lecture notes, assignments and examination questions etc., produced by staff members/ teachers of The Chinese University of Hong Kong (CUHK) belongs to CUHK. Students may download the teaching materials produced by the staff members/ teachers from the Learning Management Systems, e.g. Blackboard adopted by CUHK for their own educational use, but shall not distribute/ share/ copy the materials to a third-party without seeking prior permission from the staff members/ teachers concerned.