香港中文大學 歴史系 歴史系
聯絡我們

HIST5523 公眾史特別專題 (法制史研究):中國法律史論

2023-2024年度 第二學期

時間星期五 18:30 - 21:15

地點康本國際學術園405室 (YIA 405)

語言英語

課程講師 蘇基朗 (billyso@um.edu.mo)

助教 方成泰 (immanuelfong.cuhk@gmail.com)

課程簡介

本科加強對中國法律史的批判性理解,讓學生學習了解中國古今法律所需的概念及理論,增強其分析及討論中國法律的議題的能力,並且讓學生反省自己對正義及法治的價值觀

課程大綱
  1. 導論
  2. 宋代法律正義觀
  3. 宋明清法律與市場經濟
  4. 明清土地產權
  5. 治外法權與中國法律現代化
  6. 憲法
  7. 刑事公正與權利
  8. 民事公正與權利
  9. 訴訟、仲裁與調解
  10. 家庭法
  11. 公司法與企業
  12. 中國法律改革
  13. 結論

此為暫訂課程大綱,於第二學期開始前或會作出修訂。

課程評核及作業

五次小測(50%)

學期論文/ 報告(40%)

課堂討論(10%)

導修

待訂

參考書目

一、每週指定閱讀

1. 導論

Chen, Albert H.Y. An Introduction to the Legal System of the People’s Republic of China. 5th ed. Hong Kong: LexisNexis, 2018. Chaps.1-2.

 

2. 宋代法律正義觀

Billy K. L. So, “Sung Criminal Justice and the Modern Implication of Chinese Legal Tradition.” In Liu Tseng-kuei ed., Papers from the Third International Conference on Sinology, History Section: Law and Custom. Taipei: Institute of History and Philology, Academia Sinica, 2002. pp.63-107.

 

3. 宋明清法律與市場經濟

Billy K. L. So and Sufumi So, “Law and the Market Economy.” In Ma Debin and Richard von Glenn eds., Cambridge Economic History of China. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2021, pp.419-447.

 

4. 明清土地產權

Zhang Taisu, The Laws and Economics of Confucianism: Kinship and Property in Preindustrial China and England. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017.

 

5. 治外法權與中國法律現代化

Li Chen, Chinese Law in Imperial Eyes: Sovereignty, Justice and Transcultural Politics. New York: Columbia University Press, 2016.

 

6. 憲法

蘇基朗、蘇壽富美:《有法無天:從加藤弘之及霍姆斯到吳經熊的叢林憲法觀》中文大學出版社, 2023。

 

7. 刑事公正與權利

McConville, Mike. “Comparative Empirical Co-ordinates and the Dynamics of Criminal Justice in China and the West.” In Mike McConville and Eva Pils eds., Comparative Perspectives on Criminal Justice in China. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2013. Chap.2.

Jiang, Yonglin and Wu Yanhong. “Satisfying Both Sentiment and Law: Fairness-Centered Judicial Reasoning as Seen in late Ming Casebooks.” In Charlotte Furth, Judith T. Zeitlin and Hsiung Ping-chen, eds., Thinking with Cases: Specialist Knowing in Chinese cultural History. Honolulu, HW: University of Hawaii Press, 2007. pp.31-65.

 

8. 民事公正與權利

夫馬進:《中國訴訟社會史研究》,浙江大學出版社,2019

 

9. 訴訟、仲裁與調解

Billy K. L. So and Sufumi So, “Commercial Arbitration Transplanted: A Tale of the Book Industry in Modern Shanghai.” In Yun Zhao and Michael Ng eds., Chinese Legal Reform and Global Legal Order: Adoption and Adaptation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017.07. pp.238-256.

 

10. 家庭法

Huang, Philip. “Women’s Choices Under Qing Law: Marriage and Illicit Sex.” In his Code, Custom, and Legal Practice in China: The Qing and the Republic Compared. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2001. Chap.9.

Huang, Philip. “Women’s Choices Under Guomindang Law: Marriage, Divorce, and Adultery.” In his Code, Custom, and Legal Practice in China. Chap.10.

Huang, Philip. “Divorce Law Practices and the Origins, Myths, and Realities of Judicial “Mediation” in China.” Modern China 31. 2, (2005): 151-203.

 

11. 公司法與企業

Co-authored with Albert S. Lee. “Legalization of Chinese Corporation, 1904-1929: Innovation and Continuity in Rules and Legislation.” In B.K.L. So and Ramon H. Myers eds., Treaty Port Economy in Modern China: Empirical Studies of Institutional Change and Economic Performance, Chapter 9. Berkeley: Institution of East Asian Studies, University of California at Berkeley, 2011. pp.185-210.

 

12. 中國法律改革

“Chinese Legal Reforms in Historical and Comparative Perspective: The Legal Reforms of the 1990s and the 1070s.” Hong Kong Law Journal 40.1 (2010). pp.175-198.

 

13. 結論

 

二、其他參考資料

Fairbank, John King. China: A New History. Cambridge,MA:The Belknap Press of Harvard U Press, 1998. Chap. 8 (The Paradox of Growth without Development – Limitations of the Law), pp.183-186.

苏基朗: “现代法学诠释中的‘中华法系’-以产权与合约为中心”《法学》2006年第12期,页62-68。

梁治平: “法律史的视界:方法、旨趣与范式” 

何勤华: “汉语“法学”一词的起源及其流变” 

崔軍民:”第一章 – 1840年以前: 傳教士東來與法律新詞 – 法律”,《萌芽期的現代法律新詞研究》,北京:中國社會科學出版社,2011。頁21-23。

苏基朗:“有法无天?严复译《天演论》对20世纪初中国法律的影响” 《清华法学》, 2012年,6卷5期,页1-24。

Unger, Roberto. Law in Modern Society. The Free Press, 1976. Chap.2.

安守廉 (William Alford), “不可思议的西方? 昂格尔运用与误用中国历史的含义”收高道蕴、高鸿钧、贺卫方编:《美国学者论中国法律传统》,北京:清华大学出版社,2004增订版。页3-51。

范忠信:《中国法律传统的基本精神》,濟南:山东人民出版社, 2001。第1章。

张晋藩:《中国法律的传统与近代转型》,第3版,北京:法律出版社,2009。

Peerenboom, Randall. China’s Long March toward Rule of Law. Cambridge U Press, 2002. Chap.1 (Introduction)

McKnight, Brian. Law and Order in Sung China. Cambridge U Press, 1996. Chap.15: Conclusion.

So, Billy K. L. “Traditional Chinese Law in Action: Criminal Liability in Three Homicide Cases in Sung China (A.D. 960-1276).” Paper presented at the Fourth Conference of Asian Jurisprudence: The Rule of Law in East Asia: Formation and Development, HKU, 17-18 January 2002.

苏基朗:《唐宋法制史研究》。香港:中文大學出版社,1996 。第五章: “神宗朝阿云案辨正”。

柳立言: “一条律文各自解读—宋代「争鹑案」的争议”《中央研究院历史语言研究所集刊》73.1 (2002)。

屈超立: “论宋代法律在中华法系中的地位”,收张中秋编《中华法系国际学术研讨会文集》,北京:中国政法大学出版社,2007。页65-71。

Cassel, Par. Grounds of Judgment: Extraterritoriality and Imperial Power in 19th-century China and Japan. New York: Oxford U Press, 2012. Chap 3 (Institutionalizing Extraterritoriality: The Mixed Court and the British Supreme Court in Shanghai).

Kayaoglu, Turan. Legal Imperialism: Sovereignty and Extraterritoriality in Japan, the Ottoman Empire, and China. Cambridge: Cambridge U Press, 2010. Chap.5 (China’s struggle for sovereignty). 

So, Billy K. L. “Modern China’s Treaty-port Economy in Institutional Perspective: An Introductory Essay.” In Billy K. L. So and Ramon H. Myers eds., Treaty-port Economy in Modern China: Empirical Studies of Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Berkeley, CA: UC Berkeley, 2011. pp.1-32.

Wang, Dong. China’s Unequal Treaties: Narrating National History. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, 2005.

Alford, William. “Of Arsenic and Old Laws: Looking Anew at Criminal Justice in Late Imperial China.” California Law Review 72.6 (1984).

Bodde, Derk and Clarence Morris eds., Law in Imperial China. Cambridge, MA: Harvard U Press, 1967. Chap.1.

Chen, Albert H.Y. An Introduction to the Legal System of the People’s Republic of China. 5th ed. Hong Kong: LexisNexis, 2018. Chap.9 (The law of procedure)

Conner, Alison. “Confucianism and Due Process.” In de Bary, Wm. Theodore and Tu Weiming eds. Confucianism and Human Rights. New York: Columbia U Press, 1998. Chap. 10.

徐忠明:〈杨乃武寃案平反的背后:经济、文化、社会资本的考察〉,载氏着:《案例、故事与明清时期的司法文化》,北京:法律出版社,2006,页83-107。

胡汉民: “民法亲属继承两编中家族制度规定之意义” 载吴经熊等编:《法学文选》,北京:中国政法大学出版社,2003。页451-461。

滋賀秀三: “第四章—妇女的地位,” 载氏著,張建國、李力譯:《中國家族法原理》,北京:法律出版社,2002。页334-405。

王新宇:《民國時期婚姻法近代化研究》,北京:中国法制出版社,2006。第5章。

梁治平:《清代习惯法:国家与社会》,北京:中国政法大学出版社,1996。页67-126 (習慣法制度考略—婚姻、析產與繼承)。

厉尽国:《法治视野中的习惯法—理论与实践》,北京:中国政法大学出版社, 2003。页67-89 (习惯法的概念及其分类)。

眭鴻明:《清末民初民商事习慣調查之研究》,北京:法律出版社,2005。第6章(現代啟示) 。

蘇亦工:《中法西用: 中國傳統法律及习慣在香港》,北京:社會科學文献出版社,2002。第5章(繼承) 。

MacCormack, Geffrey. “Assistance in Conflict Resolution: Imperial China.” Transactions of the Jean Bodin Society for Comparative Institutional History 63, De Boeck Université, 1996, pp.109-153.

Fan, Kun. “Globalization of Arbitration: Transnational Standards Struggling with Local Norms Through the Lens of Arbitration Transplantation in China.” Harvard Negotiation Law Review 18 (2013), pp.175-219.

黄源盛:“大理院民事审判与民事习惯”,载氏著:《民初法律变迁与裁判》,台北:国立政治大学出版社,2000。页361-418。

Huang, Philip. “Court Mediation in China, Past and Present.” In Philip Huang and Kathryn Bernhardt eds. Research from Archival Case Records: Law, Society, and Culture in China. Leiden: Brill, 2014. Chap.15.

So, Billy K. L. Prosperity, Region, and Institutions in Maritime China: The South Fukien Pattern, 946-1368. Cambridge, MA: Harvard U Press, 2000. Chap. 10 (Formal Institutional Constraints: Law, Property, and Contracts).

邱澎生:《當法律遇上經濟: 明清中國的商業法律》,台北:五南圖書出版公司,2008。第5章(十七世紀的法律與法律推理)

范金明等:《明清商事糾紛與商業訴訟》,南京:南京大學出版社,2007。

Zelin, Madeleine. “A Critique of Rights of Property in Prewar China.” In Madeleine Zelin, J. Ocko and R Cardella, eds., Contract and Property in Early Modern China. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2004. pp. 17-36.

Kirby, William. “China Unincorporated: Company Law and Business Enterprises in Twentieth-Century China.” Journal of Asian studies 54.1 (1995), pp.43-63. 

方流芳:“ 試解薛福成和柯比的中國公司之迷”,載梁治平编:《法治在中國:制度、話語與實踐》,北京:中國政法大學出版社,2002。頁280-318。

Goetzmann, William and Elisabeth Köll. “The History of Corporate Ownership in China: State Patronage, Company Legislation, and the Issue of Control.” In Randall Morck ed. A History of Corporate Governance Around the World. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2007. Chap.2.

Clarke, Donald, Peter Murrell, and Susan Whiting. “The Role of Law in China’s Economic Development.” In Loren Brandt and Thomas Rawski eds., China’s Great Economic Transformation. Cambridge: Cambridge U Press, 2008. Chap.11.

Peerenboom, Randall. China’s Long March Toward Rule of Law. Cambridge: Cambridge U Press, 2002. Chap.11 (Rule of law, democracy, and human rights;).

Chen, Albert H.Y. An Introduction to the Legal System of the People’s Republic of China. 5th ed. Hong Kong: LexisNexis, 2018. Chaps.4-5 (Constitution and government : constitutional doctrines and state structure; Constitution and government : political parties and elections)

居正: “宪政实施筹备刍议.” 收范忠信等编:《为什么要重建中国法系—居正法政文选》,北京:中国政法大学出版社,2009。页135-139。

孙科: “中国宪法的几个问题.” 收吴经熊等编:《法学文选》,北京:中国政法大学出版社,2003。页412-418。

趙明:《近代中國的自然權利觀》,濟南:山東人民出版社,2003。页412-418 (第2章)。

Lubman, Stanley. “Chinese Law Reform: Recent Past and Possible Future.” Paper presented at the ECLS 2014 Annual Conference, CUHK, November 15-16, 2014.

So, Billy K. L. “Legitimizing New Political Order Legally: Legal Reforms in Northern Song China.” In Leung Yuen-sang ed., The Legitimation of New Orders: Cases in World History. Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press, 2007. pp.27-52..

學術著作誠信

請注意大學有關學術著作誠信的政策和規則,及適用於犯規事例的紀律指引和程序。詳情可瀏覽網址:http://www.cuhk.edu.hk/policy/academichonesty/

學生遞交作業時,必須連同已簽署的聲明一併提交,表示他們知道有關政策、規則、指引及程序。

  • 如屬小組習作,則所有組員均須簽署聲明;所有組員(不論有否簽署聲明及不論有否直接或間接撰寫有問題的內容)均須負上集體責任及受到懲處。
  • 如作業以電腦製作、內容以文字為主,並經由大學「維誠」系統 (VeriGuide) 提交者,學生將作業的電子檔案上載到系統後,便會獲得收據,收據上已列明有關聲明。

未有夾附簽署妥當的聲明的作業,老師將不予批閱。

學生只須提交作業的最終版本。

學生將作業或作業的一部份用於超過一個用途(例如:同時符合兩科的要求)而沒有作出聲明會被視為未有聲明重覆使用作業。學生重覆使用其著作的措辭或某一、二句句子很常見,並可以接受,惟重覆使用全部內容則構成問題。在任何情況下,須先獲得相關老師同意方可提交作業。

回頁頂