本課程是歷史學的入門課程。本課程旨在簡介公眾史學的理論知識以及探索公眾史學如何能在日
常生活得到實踐，連結社群。自1970年代起，有關公眾史學的討論開始進入學術界以及大眾的視
野。公眾史學是一個動態的概念，其定義和內涵會隨著時代的需求而改變，本課程旨在探討多元
視野中的公眾史學，探究社群如何透過博物館、文化遺產、大眾文化等媒界來與歷史研究建立聯
繫。

**本課程大綱只供參考，各項課程內容、評核安排乃至實地考察安排皆可能會因各項不可抗力因素而被更改，請各位密切留意電郵、Blackboard以及課堂上的公佈。**

1. 課程簡介

2. 初探多元視野下的公眾史學：何謂歷史？何謂公眾？

3. 他者與我者：公眾史學與身分認同

4. 為未來建構歷史：公眾史學與博物館

5. 不曾存在的文化遺產：文化遺產的建構與演變

6. 實地考察：香港文化博物館常設展覽（瞧潮香港60+、粵劇文物館）

7. 世界文化遺產中的地緣政治與國際搏奕

8. 旅人與在地人：公眾史學與觀光產業

9. 「貼地」與「搵食」：公眾史學與產業化

10. 實地考察：聯和趁墟（舊聯和市場）導賞與非物質文化遺產工作坊（茶粿製作）*

*同學必須出席，未能出席請與助教聯絡

11. 衝突與公義：歷史上的少數族群

12. 課程總結：我們的過去、現在與將來

**本課程大綱只供參考，各項課程內容、評核安排乃至實地考察安排皆可能會因各項不可抗力因素而被更改，請各位密切留意電郵、Blackboard以及課堂上的公佈。**

1. 期終論文 50%
學生需自訂題目，字數要求為5000字(參考資料及詮釋不計算在內)，可接受加減10%，即字數範圍
為4500字至5500字之間。

2. 導修表現及導修小組習作 40%
導修詳情會在Add-drop期結束後落實並公佈。

3. 課堂表現及參與 10%

導修詳情會在Add-drop期結束後落實並公佈。

參考書目 (本參考書目名單只供參考，請留意Blackboard有關指定書目的資料更新)

• Cauvin, Thomas. Public History: A Textbook of Practice (New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, 2016), Ch. 1, “Introduction.”
• Kelley, Robert. “Public History: Its Origins, Nature, and Prospects.” Public Historian1 (Fall 1978), pp. 16-28.
• Woods, Thomas A. “Museums and the Public: Doing History Together.” Journal of American History (Dec. 1995): 1111-1115.
• Thompson, Paul. The Voice of the Past: Oral History (Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press, 2000), pp. 309-323 (A Life-Story Interview Guide).
• Cauvin, Thomas. Public History: A Textbook of Practice (New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, 2016), Ch. 3, “Collecting and Preserving People’s Stories. Oral History, Family History, and Everyday Life.”
• Rosenzweig, Roy and David Thelen. The Presence of the Past: Popular Uses of History in American Life (New York: Columbia University Press, 1998), pp. 15-36
• Carroll, John M. “Displaying the Past to Serve the Present: Museums and Heritage Preservation in Post-Colonial Hong Kong.” Twentieth-Century China 31 (2005), pp. 76-103.
• Kohn, Richard H. “History and the Culture Wars: The Case of the Smithsonian Institution’s Enola Gay Exhibition.” The Journal of American History, Vol. 82, No. 3 (Dec. 1995), pp. 1036-1063.

• Logan, William. “States, Governance and the Politics of Culture: World Heritage in Asia.” In Routledge Handbook of Heritage in Asia (Oxon, Routledge, 2012), pp. 113-128.
• Wray, Ian. “Lessons from a Sorry World Heritage Saga.” Town & Country Planning (November/ December 2021), pp. 396-402.
• Liu, Tik-sang, ed. Intangible Cultural Heritage and Local Communities in East Asia (Hong Kong: South China Research Center, HKUST, 2011).
• Smith, Laurajane. Uses of Heritage (London & New York, Routledge, 2006), pp. 11-43.
• Cheung, Sidney C. H. “Remembering through Space: The Politics of Heritage in Hong Kong.” International Journal of Heritage Studies, 9:1 (Mar 2003), pp. 7-26.
• Henderson, Joan. “Heritage, Identity and Tourism in Hong Kong.” International Journal of Heritage Studies, 7: 3 (2001), 219-235.
• Figal, Gerald. Beachheads: War, Peace, and Tourism in Postwar Okinawa (Lanham, Md.: Rowman & Littlefield, 2012), pp. 25-49 (Ch. 1, Tours among the Ruins), pp. 51-86 (Ch. 2, The Touristification of Sacred Places).
• White, Geoffrey M. “Disney’s Pearl Harbor: National Memory at the Movies.” The Public Historian 24, no. 4 (2002), pp. 97 – 115.
• Davis, Natalie Zemon. “Movie or Monograph? A Historian/Filmmaker’s Perspective.” The Public Historian, vol. 25, no. 3 (2003), pp. 45-48.
• Goldman, Natasha. “Israeli Holocaust Memorial Strategies at Yad Vashem: From Silence to Recognition.” Art Journal (Summer 2006), pp. 102–22.
• Hung, Chang-tai. “The Monument to the People’s Heroes.” In Mao’s New World: Political Culture in the Early People’s Republic (Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press, 2011), pp. 235-255.
• Hung, Chang-tai. “Oil Paintings and History.” In Mao’s New World: Political Culture in the Early People’s Republic, 127-151.
• Schudson, Micheal. “Dynamics of Distortion in Collective Memory.” In Memory Distortion: How Minds, Brains, and Societies Reconstruct the Past, edited by Daniel L. Schacter (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1995), pp. 346-364.
• Yoshida, Takashi. The Making of the “Rape of Nanking”: History and Memory in Japan, China, and the United States (New York: Oxford University Press, 2006), pp. 129-164.

• Kwon, Vicki Sung-yeon. “The Sonyŏsang Phenomenon: Nationalism and Feminism Surrounding the “Comfort Women” Statue.” Korean Studies, Vol. 43 (2019), pp. 6-39.
• DeWitt, Lindsey E. “World Cultural Heritage and Women’s Exclusion from Sacred Sites in Japan.” Sacred Heritage in Japan, edited by Aike P. Rots and Mark Teeuwen (Oxon: Routledge, 2020), pp. 65-86.
• Smith, Laurajane. “Heritage, Gender and Identity.” In Brian Graham and Peter Howard, eds. The Ashgate Research Companion to Heritage and Identity (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2008), pp. 159-178.
• Hamilton, Paula & James B. Gardner. “The Past and Future of Public History: Developments and Challenges.” In Paula Hamilton and James B. Gardner, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Public History (New York: Oxford University Press, 2017), 1-22.

Attention is drawn to University policy and regulations on honesty in academic work, and to the disciplinary guidelines and procedures applicable to breaches of such policy and regulations. Details may be found at https://www.cuhk.edu.hk/policy/academichonesty/.

With each assignment, students will be required to submit a signed declaration that they are aware of these policies, regulations, guidelines and procedures.

• In the case of group projects, all members of the group should be asked to sign the declaration, each of whom is responsible and liable to disciplinary actions, irrespective of whether he/she has signed the declaration and whether he/she has contributed, directly or indirectly, to the problematic contents.
• For assignments in the form of a computer-generated document that is principally text-based and submitted via VeriGuide, the statement, in the form of a receipt, will be issued by the system upon students’ uploading of the soft copy of the assignment.

Assignments without the properly signed declaration will not be graded by teachers.

Only the final version of the assignment should be submitted via VeriGuide.

The submission of a piece of work, or a part of a piece of work, for more than one purpose (e.g. to satisfy the requirements in two different courses) without declaration to this effect shall be regarded as having committed undeclared multiple submissions. It is common and acceptable to reuse a turn of phrase or a sentence or two from one’s own work; but wholesale reuse is problematic. In any case, agreement from the course teacher(s) concerned should be obtained prior to the submission of the piece of work.