The Chinese University of Hong Kong Department of History Department of History
Contact Us

HIST7011C 中國古代史專題研究:秦漢出土文書 (只適用於哲學博士課程學生)

Semester 1 (2021-2022)

Lecture TimeTuesday 2:30pm - 4:15pm

VenueKHB 116

LanguagePutonghua

Lecturer LAI Ming Chiu ((852)3943 7131 / mclai@cuhk.edu.hk)

Course Description

本科以出土秦漢簡牘為研讀範圍。導師嘗試選取新出簡牘作為精讀的對象。本學期主要閲讀近年公布的《長沙五一廣場東漢簡牘》(壹)(貳)。研究生選修本科將會細讀釋文,比對圖版,疏理簡文,研究其價值,並撰寫一篇字數約一萬字的學期論文,作爲本科的學期成績。

Syllabus
  1. 簡號四百零一至四百一十八
  2. 簡號四百二十一至四百三十八
  3. 簡號四百三十九至四百五十四
  4. 簡號四百五十五至四百七十二
  5. 簡號四百七十四至四百九十
  6. 簡號四百九十一至五百零七
  7. 簡號五百零九至五百三十
Assessment & Assignments

參與討論  30%

論文(約10,000字) 70%

References

一、基本資料

長沙市文物考古研究所、清華大學出土文獻研究與保護中心、中國文化遺產研究院、湖南大學嶽麓書院編:《長沙五一廣場東漢簡牘》(壹)、(貳),上海:中西書局,2018。

長沙市文物考古研究所、清華大學出土文獻研究與保護中心、中國文化遺產研究院、湖南大學嶽麓書院編:《長沙五一廣場東漢簡牘選釋》,上海:中西書局,2015。

黃樸華、何佳、雷永利等:《湖南長沙五一廣場東漢簡牘發掘簡報》,《文物》,2013年第6期,頁4-26。

〈長沙五一廣場東漢簡牘書法特輯〉,《中國書法》,2016年9期,頁120。

〈長沙五一廣場東漢簡牘・竹簡選〉,《中國書法》,2016年9期,頁122、124-125、210-211。

〈長沙五一廣場東漢簡牘・木楬選〉,《中國書法》,2016年9期,頁127-131。

〈長沙五一廣場東漢簡牘・合檄選〉,《中國書法》,2016年9期,頁146-147。

〈長沙五一廣場東漢簡牘・木牘選〉,《中國書法》,2016年9期,頁148-153。

〈長沙五一廣場東漢簡牘・封檢選〉,《中國書法》,2016年9期,頁154-155。

〈長沙五一廣場東漢簡牘・木兩行選〉,《中國書法》,2016年9期,頁156-168。

〈長沙五一廣場東漢簡牘・函封選〉,《中國書法》,2016年9期,頁209。

長沙市文物考古研究所:《長沙尚德街東漢簡牘》,長沙:嶽麓書社,2016。

長沙市文物考古研究所、中國文物研究所,《長沙東牌樓東漢簡牘》,北京:文物出版社,2006。

王素:〈長沙東牌樓東漢簡牘選釋〉,《文物》,2005年12期,頁69-75。

長沙市文物考古研究所:〈長沙東牌樓7號古井(J7)發掘簡報〉,《文物》,2005年12期,頁4-21。

鄭曙斌:《湖南出土簡牘選編》,長沙:嶽麓書社,2013。

 

二、近人專著

李均明:《簡牘法制論稿》,桂林:廣西師範大學出版社,2011。

李均明、劉軍:《簡牘文書學》,南寧:廣西敎育出版社,1999。

李均明:《古代簡牘》,北京:文物出版社,2003。

李均明:《秦漢簡牘文書分類輯解》,北京:文物出版社,2009。

薛英群:《簡牘制度概述》,蘭州:蘭州古籍書店,1990。

程鵬萬:《簡牘帛書格式研究》,上海:上海古籍出版社,2017。

Honesty in Academic Work

Attention is drawn to University policy and regulations on honesty in academic work, and to the disciplinary guidelines and procedures applicable to breaches of such policy and regulations. Details may be found at http://www.cuhk.edu.hk/policy/academichonesty/.

With each assignment, students will be required to submit a signed declaration that they are aware of these policies, regulations, guidelines and procedures.

  • In the case of group projects, all members of the group should be asked to sign the declaration, each of whom is responsible and liable to disciplinary actions, irrespective of whether he/she has signed the declaration and whether he/she has contributed, directly or indirectly, to the problematic contents.
  • For assignments in the form of a computer-generated document that is principally text-based and submitted via VeriGuide, the statement, in the form of a receipt, will be issued by the system upon students’ uploading of the soft copy of the assignment.

Assignments without the properly signed declaration will not be graded by teachers.

Only the final version of the assignment should be submitted via VeriGuide.

The submission of a piece of work, or a part of a piece of work, for more than one purpose (e.g. to satisfy the requirements in two different courses) without declaration to this effect shall be regarded as having committed undeclared multiple submissions. It is common and acceptable to reuse a turn of phrase or a sentence or two from one’s own work; but wholesale reuse is problematic. In any case, agreement from the course teacher(s) concerned should be obtained prior to the submission of the piece of work.

Back to top