The Chinese University of Hong Kong Department of History Department of History
Contact Us

HIST7100 Reading Seminar:
The Birth and Development of Neo-Confucianism in China: Song Yuan xue’an
(For Ph.D. Students only)

Semester 2 (2020-2021)

Lecture TimeWednesday 2:30pm-4:15pm

LanguagePutonghua /
English

Lecturer CHEUNG Hiu Yu Jack ((852) 3943 5489 / hycheung@cuhk.edu.hk)

Course Description

中國思想史最重要的一大變化,是宋元以降新儒學或曰「道學」的出現。從政治、教育以至社會各層面,這一學脈對後期中華帝國影響甚鉅。本課程以中國學術史名著《宋元學案》為綱領,按圖索驥,追尋道學歷史之源。除課綱所精擇之重心學案外,本課程亦會帶領學生閱讀及分析兩宋道學核心材料,包括語錄、師說、經學講義,乃至道學家文集中的其他類型文字。通過對讀《宋元學案》與兩宋道學材料,本課程希望能夠深入部析道學誕生時的思想版圖,從而為未來的思想史研究提供新的研究問題與方法論。

課程目標:
(一) 早期道學史的研究方法、材料與意義
(二)《宋元學案》價值所在與問題意識
(三) 宋代思想史的研究路徑
(四) 道學史的現代意義

Syllabus

(暫定大綱,因應課程情況再作修訂)

版本、年代、史源
第一週:《宋元學案》介紹—緣起、版本與意義

第二週:全祖望的總體思想史
文獻材料:全祖望〈宋元儒學案序錄〉

第三週:「宋初三先生」的建構
文獻材料:〈安定學案〉、〈泰山學案〉;孫復〈上孔給事書〉、〈兖州鄒縣建孟子廟記〉;胡瑗,〈周易口義〉「發題」部份

第四週:政治與學術的交織
文獻材料:〈高平學案〉、〈盧陵學案〉;蘇軾〈范文正公集敍〉、〈歐陽居士集敍〉;*版本要求:慶元二年周必大刻本《歐陽文忠公集》

第五週:「學統四起」的十一世紀  
文獻材料:〈古靈諸先生學案〉;陳襄〈熙寧經筵論薦司馬光等三十三人章稿〉;梁克家《淳熙三山志》卷8「廟學」部份;
*版本要求:紹興三十一年本《古靈先生文集》

第六週:「道統」溯原
文獻材料:〈濂溪學案〉;度正撰〈濂溪先生周元公年表並小序〉

第七週:「道學」的建立
文獻材料:〈明道學案〉、〈伊川學案〉、〈橫渠學案〉;《程氏遺書》卷一李籲所錄語錄;程頤〈家世舊事〉、〈明道先生行狀〉;張載《經學理窟》

第八週:「道學」的早期發展(一)
文獻材料:〈滎陽學案〉、〈上蔡學案〉;《上蔡語錄》、呂大臨《儀禮說》、《禮記說》

第九週:「道學」的早期發展(二)
文獻材料:〈龜山學案〉、〈廌山學案〉;楊時文集所錄楊、游來往書信;游酢〈書明道先生行狀後〉

第十週:「道學」的早期發展(三)
文獻材料:〈和靖學案〉;《和靖尹先生文集》「師說」部份選讀
*版本要求:明嘉靖九年刻本《和靖尹先生文集》

第十一週:「道學」的早期發展(四)
文獻材料:文獻材料:〈震澤學案〉;王蘋紹興四年冬到五年春數份上殿劄子
*版本要求:清鈔明翻刻弘治本

第十二週:「道學」的早期發展(五)
〈周許諸儒學案〉;《劉左史集》「經義」部份;周行己「對策」部份

第十三週:「道學」的蔓洐
文獻材料:〈陳鄒諸儒學案〉;《四明尊堯集》選讀

第十四週:「道學」的對立面
文獻材料:〈元祐黨禁〉、〈荊公新學略〉、〈蘇氏蜀學略〉;王安石論議選讀

Assessment & Assignments

1. 平時課堂表現及討論 40%
2. 學期論文 60%

References

參考閱讀文獻:

  1. 何俊:〈宋元儒學的重建與清初思想史觀—以《宋元學案》全氏補本為中心的考察〉,《中國史研究》(2006.2):131-145。
  2. 張曉宇:〈學統四起下的北宋古禮運動:陳烈事跡的一個思想史考察〉,《新史學》30.2 (2019.6):111–168。
  3. _____.〈學派以外: 北宋士人鄒浩的政治及學術思想〉,《思想史》,聯經出版有限公司 8 (2018.12):1–46。
  4. 黃富榮:〈胡瑗易名義發微〉,《東方文化》42.1-2(2009): 149-67。
  5. 張藝曦:〈史語所藏宋儒學案在清中葉的編纂與流傳〉,《中央研究院歷史語言研究所集刊》 80 (2009.9):451–506。
  6. 彭國翔:〈黃宗羲佚著《理學錄》考論〉,收入《文化與歷史的追索:余英時教授八秩壽慶論文集》。台北:聯經出版,2009。
  7. 劉子健:《歐陽修的治學與從政》,香港:新亞研究所。
  8. 田智忠:《諸儒鳴道集研究—兼對前朱子時代道學發展的考察》,北京:中國社會科學出版社,2002。
  9. 黃士毅本《朱子語類彙校》,上海:上海古籍出版社,2014。
  10. 黎靖德本《朱子語類》,北京:中華書局。
  11. 早板俊廣:〈關於宋元學案的浙學概念〉,《浙江大學學報》32.1 (2002):110–115。
  12. 土田健次郎:《道学の形成》,東京:創文社,2002。並參朱剛中譯本。
  13. 市來津由彥:《朱熹門人集團形成の研究》,東京:創文社,2002。
  14. 夏長樸:〈發六百年來儒林所不及知者-全祖望續補《宋元學案》的學術史意義〉,《臺大中文學報》 34 (2011): 305¬¬–348。
  15. 姜鵬:《北宋經筵與宋學的興起》,上海﹕上海古籍出版社,2003。
  16. Bol, Peter. Neo-Confucianism in History. Cambridge: Harvard University Asia Center, 2008.
  17. _____. “The Rise of Local History: History, Geography, and Culture in Southern Song and Yuan Wuzhou.” Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies 61.1: 37–76.
  18. Cheung, Hiu Yu. “The Way Turning Inward: An Examination of the ‘New Learning’ Usage of daoxue in Northern Song China.” Philosophy East and West. Print: 69.1 (2019.1): 86–107.
  19. Hartman, Charles. “Bibliographic Notes on Sung Historical Works: The Original Record of the Way and Its Destiny (Tao-ming lu) by Li Hsin-ch’uan,” Journal of Song-Yuan Studies 20 (2000):1–61.
  20. Huang Yong. Why Be Moral? Learning from the Neo-Confucian Cheng Brothers. Albany: State University of New York Press, 2014.
  21. Li Cho-ying and Charles Hartman. “A Newly Discovered Inscription of Qin Gui: Its Implications for the History of Song Daoxue.” Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies 70.2 (2010): 387–448.
  22. Tillman, Hoyt Cleveland. Confucian discourse and Chu Hsi’s ascendancy. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press, 1992.
Honesty in Academic Work

Attention is drawn to University policy and regulations on honesty in academic work, and to the disciplinary guidelines and procedures applicable to breaches of such policy and regulations. Details may be found at http://www.cuhk.edu.hk/policy/academichonesty/.

With each assignment, students will be required to submit a signed declaration that they are aware of these policies, regulations, guidelines and procedures.

  • In the case of group projects, all members of the group should be asked to sign the declaration, each of whom is responsible and liable to disciplinary actions, irrespective of whether he/she has signed the declaration and whether he/she has contributed, directly or indirectly, to the problematic contents.
  • For assignments in the form of a computer-generated document that is principally text-based and submitted via VeriGuide, the statement, in the form of a receipt, will be issued by the system upon students’ uploading of the soft copy of the assignment.

Assignments without the properly signed declaration will not be graded by teachers.

Only the final version of the assignment should be submitted via VeriGuide.

The submission of a piece of work, or a part of a piece of work, for more than one purpose (e.g. to satisfy the requirements in two different courses) without declaration to this effect shall be regarded as having committed undeclared multiple submissions. It is common and acceptable to reuse a turn of phrase or a sentence or two from one’s own work; but wholesale reuse is problematic. In any case, agreement from the course teacher(s) concerned should be obtained prior to the submission of the piece of work.

Back to top