HIST3404 史學名著與典籍
Semester 1 (2019-2020)
Lecture TimeTuesday 4:30pm-6:15pm
VenueLHC G04
LanguageCantonese
Lecturer CHEUNG Hiu Yu Jack ((852) 3943 5489 / hycheung@cuhk.edu.hk)
Teaching Assistant TAN Xiaojun (gracexjt97@gmail.com)
中國傳統文獻七錄四部之中包含了許多思想史的材料。通過主要選讀乙部一些重要文獻，本課程希望引導同學打破古今文字之隔膜，瞭解思想史基本材料的源流及派洐，進而對思想史研究產生興趣。此外，本課程也會討論近代中國學術史的一些名著，希望讓同學們更全面地審視中國思想與學術的書寫流變。
課程目標:
(一) 瞭解中國傳統思想史名著
(二) 培養細緻文獻閱讀能力
(三) 把握傳統思想史的書寫體例
(四) 理解近代中國學術史的建立與代表作
課程大綱 (暫定)
第一講: 引言—中國思想史的文獻材料
第二講:先秦學術與《莊子.天下篇》：向心力與離心力
第三講:劉氏父子與《漢書.藝文志》：校勘學與學術分類
第四講:三史《儒林傳》：思想的系統化與歷史意義
第五講:《世說新語》、《高僧傳》與《真誥》：魏、晉、隋、唐的異類思想史
第六講:《通典》與《通志》：思想書寫的承傳與創新
第七講: 馬氏父子與《文獻通考》：思想的動態考察
第八講:《直齋書錄解題》與《郡齋讀書志》：客觀方法中的主觀意識
第九講:朱熹與《伊洛淵源錄》：思想的排他性
第十講:明清學術傳記體裁（一）：全祖望與〈宋元儒學案序錄〉
第十一講:明清學術傳記體裁（二）：《國朝漢學師承記》與《國朝宋學師承記》
第十二講:思想的「總體史」：《經籍考》與《四庫全書總目提要》
第十三講: 中國近代學術史書寫中的傳統延續：章太炎、劉師培、梁啟超、錢穆
課程評核及導修要求 (暫定):
1. 平時課堂表現及討論 10%
2. 思想史文獻校讀釋義 60%
3. 導修 (文獻校讀) 30%
- 思想史文獻釋義佔本課程評分60%，字數以7000-10000字左右為佳。上限不得超過12000字，否則可能會被酌情扣分。
- 導修課程為文獻校讀，共四次。四次導修均需出席。無故缺席者將喪失該次導修全部分數。
- 每次導修將由一組同學負責口頭報告，報告時間為30分鐘。非本次報告同學每人需根據報告提出一個問題并參與課堂討論。報告同學需回應問題。
- 報告需於導修課前四個工作天交到老師和助教手中。
導修分數分佈：
口頭報告：10％
書面報告：10％
課堂出席及參與討論：10％
導修報告和學期文獻研究報告均需如期繳交。遲交者一天扣分3%；學期論文遲交者一天扣分10%。
報告要求：
校讀──瞭解文意，知曉典故，注釋文獻關鍵辭句，兼及分析文獻背景。能討論文獻版本、刊刻歷史者尤佳。
釋義──分析文獻及撰、作者背景，文獻的目的及受眾，文獻在思想史上的意義。
Attention is drawn to University policy and regulations on honesty in academic work, and to the disciplinary guidelines and procedures applicable to breaches of such policy and regulations. Details may be found at http://www.cuhk.edu.hk/policy/academichonesty/.
With each assignment, students will be required to submit a signed declaration that they are aware of these policies, regulations, guidelines and procedures.
- In the case of group projects, all members of the group should be asked to sign the declaration, each of whom is responsible and liable to disciplinary actions, irrespective of whether he/she has signed the declaration and whether he/she has contributed, directly or indirectly, to the problematic contents.
- For assignments in the form of a computer-generated document that is principally text-based and submitted via VeriGuide, the statement, in the form of a receipt, will be issued by the system upon students’ uploading of the soft copy of the assignment.
Assignments without the properly signed declaration will not be graded by teachers.
Only the final version of the assignment should be submitted via VeriGuide.
The submission of a piece of work, or a part of a piece of work, for more than one purpose (e.g. to satisfy the requirements in two different courses) without declaration to this effect shall be regarded as having committed undeclared multiple submissions. It is common and acceptable to reuse a turn of phrase or a sentence or two from one’s own work; but wholesale reuse is problematic. In any case, agreement from the course teacher(s) concerned should be obtained prior to the submission of the piece of work.
